Ideologi dan Relasi Kuasa dalam Pemberitaan Kematian Gajah Sumatera: Kajian Analisis Wacana Kritis Teun A. Van Dijk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63822/rjdnef97Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, ideology, power relations, conservation, Sumatran elephant.Abstract
This study aims to analyze ideology and power relations in the reporting of the death of a Sumatran elephant in Riau using Teun A. Van Dijk's Critical Discourse Analysis model. This study employed a qualitative approach, using data from three purposively selected online news texts. Data collection was conducted through documentation, while data analysis encompassed the text's macrostructure, superstructure, and microstructure, as well as dimensions of social cognition and social context. The results show that the media framed the event as a crime against protected animals and an ecological tragedy. The dominance of official sources reinforced the legitimacy of state institutions, while the use of emotional lexicon and passive voice created a dramatic effect while obscuring the perpetrators. These findings confirm that the reporting is not neutral, but rather represents power relations and specific ideological tendencies in conservation issues.
References
Badara, Aris. 2012. Analisis Wacana: Teori, Metode, dan Penerapannya pada Wacana Media. Jakarta: Kencana.
Eriyanto. 2001. Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Hamad, Ibnu. 2004. “Konstruksi Realitas Politik dalam Media Massa: Sebuah Studi Analisis Wacana Kritis.” Makara Sosial Humaniora, Vol. 8, No. 1, hlm. 21–29.
Sobur, Alex. 2012. Analisis Teks Media: Suatu Pengantar untuk Analisis Wacana, Analisis Semiotik, dan Analisis Framing. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakary.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Apriliani Daely, Aulia Hasanah , Retno Anggelica Aini, Riva Amanda, Shela Jenari Marbun, Dewi Arisnofita (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



