Strategi Pengembangan Mutu Pendidikan dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Era Digital di Sekolah SMAS IT Kalimantan Selatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63822/6t58xd85Keywords:
educational quality, digital era, digital transformation, digital leadership, teacher digital competence.Abstract
The development of digital technology has brought significant changes to the world of education and requires educational institutions to continuously adapt to improve the quality of educational services. The digital era presents various opportunities to support more effective and innovative learning processes, but also raises challenges related to the readiness of human resources, technological infrastructure, and educational management. This study aims to analyze strategies for developing educational quality in facing the challenges of the digital era at SMAS IT South Kalimantan. The research method used is a qualitative approach with a type of library research through the collection and analysis of various relevant scientific sources, such as journals, books, research results, and educational policy documents. The results of the study indicate that developing educational quality at SMAS IT South Kalimantan in facing the digital era requires an integrated strategy, including strengthening teachers' digital competence, developing a curriculum that is adaptive to technological developments, optimizing the use of information technology in the learning process, strengthening the principal's digital leadership, and implementing a digital-based quality assurance system. In addition, collaboration between schools, the government, parents, and the community is a crucial factor in supporting the success of educational transformation. Challenges faced include limited technological infrastructure, gaps in educators' digital competence, and the need to develop an organizational culture that is responsive to change. Therefore, developing educational quality needs to be carried out sustainably through adaptive policies, increasing human resource capacity, and optimal use of technology. This study provides a conceptual contribution to understanding educational quality development strategies that schools can implement to produce quality, relevant education that meets the demands of the digital era.
References
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (Fourth edition). SAGE.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
European Commission. Joint Research Centre. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Hidayat, R., & Patras, Y. E. (2024). Digital Leadership of School Principals in Indonesia: Strategic Interventions Needed. Pedagogia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 16(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagogia.v16i1.10209
Kelly, M. (2024). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030 project background.
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
OECD. (2023). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en
Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Rahayuningsih, Y. S., & Muhtar, T. (2022). Pedagogik Digital Sebagai Upaya untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Guru Abad 21. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6960–6966. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3433
Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education (3rd ed). Kogan Page ; Stylus Pub.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Sixth edition). SAGE.
Thornton, J. A., & Harrison, M. J. (1975). Letter: Duration of action of AH8165. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 47(9), 1033. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/47.9.1033
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Bahid, Twirid Sayafarotun, Dakir Dakir, Jasiah Jasiah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
