Penahanan Ijazah Pekerja oleh Pengusaha dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Ketenagakerjaan

Authors

  • Wahyu Aliansa Universitas Halu Oleo Author
  • Ayib Rosidin Universitas Halu Oleo Author
  • Arfa Arfa Universitas Halu Oleo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63822/qdz27874

Keywords:

diploma; embezzlement; labour criminal law; National Criminal Code; ultimum remedium

Abstract

Employers commonly withhold workers' original diplomas, yet the Manpower Law does not prohibit the practice and law enforcers rely on embezzlement. This normative legal study examines whether withholding diplomas constitutes embezzlement under Articles 486 and 488 of the National Criminal Code and how its prohibition should be formulated in labour legislation. Withholding during employment does not satisfy the element of appropriation, because the employer still acknowledges the worker's ownership; the element is satisfied only when the employer refuses to return the diploma after employment ends, demands a ransom, or loses it. The new labour law should adopt tiered regulation: a prohibition, administrative sanctions, and criminal sanctions for disobeying a return order.

References

Aliansa, W. (2026). Rekonstruksi Norma Perjanjian Kerja PPPK: Harmonisasi Perlindungan Ketenagakerjaan dan Akses Jabatan dalam Sistem ASN. Jatiswara, 41(2), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v41i2.1386

Anggraini, S. D. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Pekerja atas Penahanan Ijazah yang Dilakukan Pengusaha. Jurnal Kajian Konstitusi, 2(1), 69–92.

Grasera, B. O., Yuniar, P. H., Pujiastuti, E., & Arifin, Z. (2026). Diploma Retention Clause in Employment Relationships: The Power Dynamics Between Employees and Employers. Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law, 7(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.22437/mendapo.v7i1.53275

Haris, O. K., Herman, H., Hariyanto, H., Hassan, F. M., & Aliansa, W. (2026). Operationalising the Ultimum Remedium Principle in Indonesian Mining Law: Administrative Sanctions, Mining Work Plan and Budget Compliance, and Criminal Enforcement Thresholds. Khazanah Hukum, 8(2), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v8i2.54320

Hendri, Simanjuntak, P. J., & Prasetyo, T. (2026). Urgency of Criminal Liability for Corporations Paying Wages below the Minimum Wage Based on Justice Values. Global Legal Review, 6(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.19166/glr.v6i1.9107

Herman, H., Haris, O. K., Hassan, F. M., Kamaruddin, K., & Aliansa, W. (2026). Integrating Sara Pataanguna Values into Social Work Crimes under Indonesia's New Criminal Code: A Humanistic Approach Rooted in Buton Culture. F1000Research, 15, 693. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.179820.1

Indradjaja, N., & Chamdani, C. (2023). Legal Protection for Outsourced Workers/Laborers towards Diploma Detention Policy Committed by the Employer. Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31098/jgrcs.v3i1.1378

Naftali, K. E., & Lie, G. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Buruh dalam Praktik Penahanan Ijazah oleh Perusahaan di Indonesia. Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.62383/mahkamah.v3i2.1595

Pratiwi, W. B., Purwono, R. T. Y., & Aisya. (2026). Juridical Analysis of Legal Protection for Workers against the Retention of Diplomas and Personal Documents in Employment Contracts. Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum, 8(2), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v8i2.7102

Siswanto, V. O., & Syailendra, M. R. (2025). Review of the Minister of Manpower's Circular Letter Number M/5/HK.04.00/V/2025 in Providing Legal Justice for Workers. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 8(4), 750–760.

Soesilo, R. (1995). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal demi Pasal. Bogor: Politeia.

Sukardi, E., Pasaribu, D., & Kaliye, V. X. (2021). Penahanan Ijazah Pekerja oleh Pemberi Kerja dalam Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Law Review, 20(3), 300–322. https://doi.org/10.19166/lr.v0i0.3107

Wibowo, D., & Sulaiman, A. (2020). Penahanan Ijazah Pekerja oleh Perusahaan dalam Perjanjian Kerja Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan: Studi Putusan Nomor 205/Pdt.G/2019/PN.SDA. Journal of Legal Research, 2(2), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v2i2.17069

Wiryawan, I. W. G. (2021). Aspek Pidana dari Menahan Ijazah Pekerja sebagai Jaminan dalam Perjanjian Kerja. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 4(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v4i2.5315

Yusdheaputra, W. (2023). Kedudukan Surat Edaran Menteri dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurist-Diction, 6(1), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v6i1.43557

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Wetboek van Strafrecht).

Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang.

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan sebagaimana telah beberapa kali diubah, terakhir dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur Nomor 8 Tahun 2016.

Surat Edaran Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Nomor M/5/HK.04.00/V/2025 tentang Larangan Penahanan Ijazah dan/atau Dokumen Pribadi Milik Pekerja/Buruh oleh Pemberi Kerja.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 1/PUU-XI/2013.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo Nomor 205/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sda.

Published

2026-10-28

How to Cite

Aliansa, W., Rosidin, A. ., & Arfa, A. (2026). Penahanan Ijazah Pekerja oleh Pengusaha dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Ketenagakerjaan. Jejak Digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(6), 11168-11177. https://doi.org/10.63822/qdz27874