Analisis Keunggulan Komparatif Ekspor Bahan Bakar Mineral Indonesia ke China Tahun 2018-2025

Authors

  • Audy Vina Novitria Universitas Bojonegoro Author
  • Elsa Oktavia Arlinda Universitas Bojonegoro Author
  • Anisa Nur Fidiyah Universitas Bojonegoro Author
  • Anisa Nur Vita Universitas Bojonegoro Author
  • Fahrizal Taufiqqurrachman Universitas Bojonegoro Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63822/t03c3b91

Keywords:

Comparative Advantage, Mineral Fuels, Indonesian Exports, China, Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA).

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the comparative advantage of Indonesian mineral fuel exports to China during the period 2018–2025. Mineral fuels are one of Indonesia's important export commodities and contribute to its international trade relations, particularly with China as one of its major trading partners. This study employs a quantitative descriptive approach using secondary data obtained from Trade Map, covering Indonesia's mineral fuel exports to China, China's mineral fuel imports from the world, and Indonesia's total exports. The data are analyzed using the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) method to identify the comparative advantage of Indonesian mineral fuel exports in the Chinese market. The results show that the value of Indonesian mineral fuel exports to China experienced fluctuations throughout the observation period. Export values increased significantly in 2021 and reached their highest level in 2022, before declining from 2023 to 2025. Furthermore, the RCA values recorded in the dataset remained below 1 throughout the period, ranging from 0.19 to 0.33. These findings indicate that Indonesian mineral fuel exports have not demonstrated a comparative advantage in the Chinese market during the period studied. Therefore, improvements in export competitiveness and market positioning are necessary to strengthen Indonesia's presence in China's mineral fuel market.

References

International Energy Agency. (2025). Coal 2025: Analysis and forecast to 2030. https://www.iea.org/reports/coal-2025

International Trade Centre. (n.d.). Trade Map: Trade statistics for international business development. https://www.trademap.org/

Qisthina, N., Nikensari, S. I., & Yuniarti, P. (2024). Analisis daya saing ekspor batu bara Indonesia ke ASEAN. EKOMA: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi, 3(4), 1523–1531. https://doi.org/10.56799/ekoma.v3i4.3642

Rahmawan, N. B., & Oktora, S. I. (2018). The impact of zero import tariff policy and air pollution prevention and control action plan on Indonesian coal export to China. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 12(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v12i1.263

Rasbin. (2025). Indonesia–China trade balance deficits: A wake-up call for downstreaming and export diversification. Info Singkat, XVII(19). Pusat Analisis Keparlemenan, Badan Keahlian DPR RI.

Stellian, R., & Danna-Buitrago, J. P. (2022). Revealed comparative advantage and contribution-to-the-trade-balance indexes. International Economics, 170, 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2022.02.007

Suparmono, S., Suandana, E., & Ilmas, F. (2022). Determining competitiveness of Indonesian export commodities using revealed comparative analysis. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 23(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.v23i1.13557

Ulia, D. H., & Rindayati, W. (2025). Komparasi daya saing dan determinan ekspor produk turunan batubara Indonesia-Australia ke pasar Asia. Journal of Management, Accounting, and Administration, 2(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.52620/jomaa.v2i1.187

Yulia, S., & Chandriyanti, I. (2021). Analisis daya saing komparatif dan kompetitif ekspor komoditas batu bara tiga negara berkembang (Indonesia, Afrika Selatan dan Kolombia). Ecoplan, 4(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.20527/ecoplan.v4i2.339

Published

2026-11-14

How to Cite

Novitria, A. V., Arlinda, E. O. ., Fidiyah, A. N. ., Vita, A. N. ., & Taufiqqurrachman, F. . (2026). Analisis Keunggulan Komparatif Ekspor Bahan Bakar Mineral Indonesia ke China Tahun 2018-2025. Jejak Digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 2(6), 11473-11485. https://doi.org/10.63822/t03c3b91

Most read articles by the same author(s)