Evaluasi Kinerja Lingkungan Rocket Stove dalam Mengurangi Polusi Udara Outdoor di Desa Cibarusah Jaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63822/5g64ph69Keywords:
polusi udara, rocket stove, teknologi ramah lingkunganAbstract
Polusi udara merupakan salah satu permasalahan lingkungan yang paling mendesak di wilayah perkotaan, khususnya di Desa Cibarusah Jaya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi kinerja lingkungan rocket stove dalam mengurangi polusi udara outdoor di Desa Cibarusah Jaya. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif, studi ini menganalisis efektivitas rocket stove sebagai alternatif teknologi pembakaran yang lebih bersih dibandingkan dengan kompor tradisional. Penelitian dilakukan melalui observasi lapangan, wawancara mendalam dengan pengguna, dan analisis dokumentasi di Desa Cibarusah Jaya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi rocket stove mampu mengurangi emisi partikulat dan gas berbahaya hingga 60-80% dibandingkan dengan kompor kayu tradisional. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja meliputi desain combustion chamber, kualitas bahan bakar, dan perilaku pengguna. Penelitian ini memberikan rekomendasi untuk pengembangan kebijakan dan program implementasi rocket stove sebagai solusi teknologi tepat guna untuk mengatasi masalah polusi udara di Desa Cibarusah Jaya.
References
Bailis, R., Ogle, D., MacCarty, N., & Still, D. (2009). The water boiling test (WBT). Household Energy and Health Programme, Shell Foundation.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Jetter, J., Zhao, Y., Smith, K. R., Khan, B., Yelverton, T., DeCarlo, P., & Hays, M. D. (2012). Pollutant emissions and energy efficiency under controlled conditions for household biomass cookstoves and implications for metrics useful in setting international test standards. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(19), 10827–10834. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301693f
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kshirsagar, M. P., & Kalamkar, V. R. (2014). A comprehensive review on biomass cookstoves and a systematic approach for modern cookstove design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 580–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.039
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
MacCarty, N., Still, D., & Ogle, D. (2008). Fuel use and emissions performance of fifty cooking stoves in the laboratory and related benchmarks of performance. Energy for Sustainable Development, 12(2), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60429-9
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Putra, A., & Sari, N. (2020). Analisis performa rocket stove berbasis biomassa untuk rumah tangga pedesaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Energi Terbarukan, 8(2), 85–94.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Ruiz-Mercado, I., & Masera, O. (2015). Patterns of stove use in the context of fuel–device stacking: Rationale and implications. EcoHealth, 12(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-015-1009-4
Shen, G., Chen, Y., Russell, A. G., Hu, Y., Zhong, Q., Xu, H., ... & Tao, S. (2017). Impacts of household stove improvements on PM2.5 emissions in Xuanwei, China: Implications for climate and health co-benefits. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(2), 1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04206
Smith, K. R., Bruce, N., Balakrishnan, K., Adair-Rohani, H., Balmes, J., Chafe, Z., ... & Rehfuess, E. (2014). Millions dead: How do we know and what does it mean? Methods used in the comparative risk assessment of household air pollution. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182356
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Uphoff, N., & Wijayaratna, C. M. (2000). Demonstrated benefits from social capital: The productivity of farmer organizations in Gal Oya, Sri Lanka. World Development, 28(11), 1875–1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00063-2
World Health Organization. (2016). Burning opportunity: Clean household energy for health, sustainable development, and well-being of women and children. WHO Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Etty Zuliawati Zed, Nurul Azizah Ul Utami, Meiry Hana Wijaya, Intan Maharani, Rosma Debi, Deris Pernandi Putra, M. Ridha Rasepto, Zulfikri, Putra Rizqi Ramadhani, Ayu Trisna, Mirza Adityantoro, Ernawati (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
