Rekonstruksi Amar Ma’ruf Nahi Munkar sebagai Paradigma Konseling Profetik-Emansipatoris: Fondasi Teoretis Masyarakat Non-Kekerasan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63822/y2g1zd63Keywords:
Prophetic-Emancipatory Counseling; Amar Ma’ruf Nahi Munkar; Social Violence; Non-Violence; Prophetic Theology; Social Transformation; Critical Consciousness.Abstract
This article departs from the escalating reality of violence in contemporary society, which manifests not only in physical forms but also in structural, symbolic, and digital dimensions that operate systemically and are often legitimized within social practices, including religious discourses. Although the concept of non-violence has been widely discussed across disciplines, existing approaches remain largely normative and have yet to provide an operational framework that integrates theological, psychological, and social dimensions. The research gap lies in the absence of a conceptual formulation that reconstructs amar ma’ruf nahi munkar as a transformative method capable of addressing the problem of violence in a holistic manner. This study employs an integrative theoretical approach that combines prophetic theology, critical social theory, and counseling psychology. The research method is qualitative with a philosophical-critical orientation, utilizing hermeneutic analysis of religious texts alongside critical discourse analysis of contemporary academic literature. This approach enables a contextual reinterpretation of Islamic normative concepts while critically engaging with the surrounding social realities. The main argument of this article asserts that amar ma’ruf nahi munkar should be reconstructed as a Prophetic-Emancipatory Counseling paradigm—namely, a dialogical, reflective, and transformative process aimed at fostering critical consciousness at both individual and collective levels in order to transform structures of violence. This paradigm integrates divine values (prophetic dimension), emancipatory awareness (critical liberation), and dialogical practice (counseling) into a coherent and operational framework.The scientific contribution of this article lies in the development of a novel conceptual paradigm that bridges spirituality, psychology, and social theory in the pursuit of a non-violent society. The novelty of this study resides in the reinterpretation of amar ma’ruf nahi munkar as an emancipatory and applicable form of social counseling, making it relevant for addressing the complexities of violence in modern society.
References
Abdullah, N. A. (2024). Islamic feminism and social justice: A critical approach. Islamic Studies Review, 29(2), 201–220.
Castells, M. (2021). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 15, 238–266.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2022). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Qualitative Research Journal, 22(1), 45–60.
Denzin, N. K. (2021). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Qualitative Research, 21(3), 321–340.
Giroux, H. A. (2021). Critical pedagogy and the crisis of public values. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(9), 889–901.
Habermas, J. (2022). Religion and the public sphere: Revisited. European Journal of Philosophy, 30(1), 1–18.
Halafoff, A. (2022). Religion, spirituality and social transformation in a global age. Journal of Sociology, 58(2), 123–140.
Koenig, H. G. (2022). Religion, spirituality, and mental health: Research and clinical implications. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 57(1), 1–14.
Lee, S. (2022). Faith-based community development and social cohesion. Social Movement Studies, 21(3), 301–318.
Miles, J. (2022). Dialogical counseling and social change: Expanding the scope of therapeutic practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 69(4), 512–528.
Rahman, A. (2023). Religion and social transformation: Integrating critical theory and Islamic ethics. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 38(1), 67–84.
Saeed, A. (2021). Contextualist approaches to Qur’anic ethics in the modern world. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 23(2), 45–68.
van Dijk, T. A. (2020). Critical discourse analysis and social theory: Bridging the gap. Discourse & Society, 31(4), 447–460.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dita Nabila, Elfita Fitriani, Muhamad Ulul Azmi , Ali Hasan Siswanto (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




