Tumpang Tindih Fungsi Pengawasan Komisi Yudisial dan Mahkamah Agung: Tantangan dalam Mewujudkan Peradilan yang Berintegritas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63822/x2byrn05Keywords:
Judicial Commission, Supreme Court, Judge Supervision, Judicial Power, Overlapping Authority.Abstract
The judiciary plays an important role in upholding law and justice in Indonesia. To maintain the integrity of judges, two supervisory bodies were established: the Judicial Commission (KY) and the Supreme Court (MA). However, in practice, there is often an overlap of authority between the two institutions, especially in terms of overseeing the behavior of judges. This research aims to trace the root of the overlapping issues by reviewing the legal basis governing the authority of the Judicial Commission (KY) and the Supreme Court (MA), and its impact on the independence of the judiciary. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach, as well as examining several Constitutional Court decisions related to this issue. The study results indicate that the overlap in oversight functions is caused by unclear boundaries of authority as stipulated in the law, leading to potential institutional conflict. Going forward, it is necessary to align regulations and improve coordination between the Judicial Commission (KY) and the Supreme Court (MA) so that the oversight function can operate more effectively without disrupting the independence of the judiciary.
Downloads
References
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Pasal 13 Undang- Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Yudisial
Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2011 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Aziz, Muhammad, dkk. 2023. “Politik Reformasi Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Sebagai Penguatan Pengawasan Terhadap Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 8, no. 3 (September): 399.
Budi Utami, Nur A. 2025. “Persepsi Publik Terhadap Integritas Hakim: Analisis Survei Integritas Hakim oleh Komisi Yudisial RI.” Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik 10, no. 1 (April): 85.
Irawan, Indra P, dkk. 2025. “Dinamika Politik Hukum dalam Penegakan Kode Etik Hakim: Menghadapi Tekanan Politik dan Krisis Integritas Peradilan Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 5 (Juni): 4.
Jurnal ISO: Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora. (2023). Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dalam Pengawasan Hakim: Analisis Terhadap Putusan MK No. 005/PUU-IV/2006. Penerbit Administrasi Negara, PubMedia.
Komisi Yudisial RI, Laporan Tahunan: Sinergi Pengawasan Hakim (Jakarta, 2021).
Salsabila, Ratu T, dkk. 2024. “ANALISIS KEWENANGAN ANTARA MAHKAMAH AGUNG DENGAN KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM PENGAWASAN HAKIM BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN.” Journal of Constitutional Law 1, no. 1 (Februari): 71-76. https://doi.org/10.22437/limbago.v4i1.
Setiadi, Edi. 2021. “Hubungan Ideal Komisi Yudisial dan Mahkamah Agung.” WAWASAN YURIDIKA 5, no. 2 (September): 172. 10.25072/jwy.v5i2.459.
Suparto. 2020. “Perlunya Amandemen Terhadap Pasal 24 B ayat 1 UUD 1945 dalam Rangka Pengawasan Terhadap Hakim Konstitusi.” Borneo Law Review 4, no. 2 (Juni): 32.
Talaba, A. S. (2021). KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DAN KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM PENGAWASAN PERILAKU HAKIM: AUTHORITY OF THE SUPREME COURT AND THE JUDICIAL COMMISSION IN SUPERVISION OF THE BEHAVIOR OF JUDGES. Jurnal Media Hukum, 9(2), 96-106.
Yunita, F. T., Umami, A. B., Ananda, A. A. S., & Anggraeni, R. P. (2021). Penguatan Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial di Indonesia: Perspektif Konstitusional dan Kontekstual. Jurnal Kajian Konstitusi, 1(1), 1-25.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cindy Amalia, Kurnia Ayu Agustin, Prastian Nur Huda, Herfita Ayu Nayla, Damar Arrya Akbar A (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
