Perspektif Dibalik Perilaku Living Together di Kalangan Mahasiswa di Kota Semarang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63822/2cpkg639Keywords:
Living Together, StudentAbstract
This study aims to determine the perspectives behind cohabitation behavior among students in Semarang City. This study uses a qualitative approach with a phenomenological method. The results of the study can be drawn several conclusions as follows: (a) Subjective Perspective and Meaning: Student actors interpret cohabitation not merely as a deviation, but as a form of "compatibility test" or trial marriage to understand the character of the partner before a long-term commitment. There is a construction of meaning that places personal autonomy and efficiency above traditional norms; (b) Primary Motivation: There is a mutually reinforcing dichotomy of motivations, namely emotional-psychological motivation to gain closeness and intensive affection3, and pragmatic-economic motivation in the form of saving on living costs (such as rent and food) through shared burdens; and (c) Dynamics and Risks: Cohabitation is characterized by a complex adaptation phase, where relationships often become more vulnerable due to conflicts of daily habits and loss of privacy5555. The most obvious risks include decreased academic performance (delay in graduation)6 as well as moral burdens and social pressures that require them to carry out strategies of hiding their identity ("acting") in the community environment
References
A.kinanti latifatul. (2023). STUDI KASUS GAYA BERPACARAN LIVING TOGETHER PADA MAHASISWA KOS KOTA BANDUNG SKRIPSI.
Bermasyarakat, D. K., Cooley, C. H., Hebert, G., & Blumer, H. (n.d.). Penulis Dosen Prodi Pelayanan Pastoral STP IPI Malang. 118–131.
Dalam, K., Dan, P. H. R. A., & Ayat, P. (2024). Kohabitasi Dalam Perspektif H.R. Al-Tirmidzi Dan Pasal 412 Ayat (1) KUHP. 3(3).
Di, K., & Kos, L. (2025). SKRIPSI ANALISIS KRIMINOLOGI TERHADAP PENANGGULANGAN PRAKTIK KOHABITASI DI LINGKUNGAN KOS MAHASISWA Disusun untuk memperoleh gelar Sarjana Hukum.
Islamic, J. O. F., & Studies, L. A. W. (2025). KOHABITASI DALAM KUHP 2023 : ANALISIS YURIDIS ATAS INTERVENSI HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP. 9(1), 1–17.
Jurnal, S., Agama, P., Ir, D., Wira, A., Lao, H. A. E., Kristen, A., & Kupang, N. (2025). Strategi Gereja dalam Menyikapi Persoalan Kohabitasi untuk Meningkatkan Spiritualitas Pemuda di Jemaat GMIT Sion Babuin , Klasis Amanuban Tengah Selatan. 5(1), 108–126.
Kebo, K., Pendatang, M., Kost, X., Jalan, Y., Bori, U., Bitoa, K., Manggala, K., & Makassar, K. (2024). Education , Language , and Culture ( EDULEC ). 2, 223–237.
Made, N., Paramitha, D., Luh, N., & Desira, I. (2024). Peran Adversity Intelligence terhadap Kecemasan pada Mahasiswa Psikologi dalam Tahap Emerging Adulthood. 8(1), 11–24.
Muthia, U., Amanda, E. R., Wiwinda, A., & Kurniawan, R. (2024). BUDAYA COHABITATION : TINJAUAN KRITIS DARI KACAMATA. 8(10), 55–62.
Novanza, D. B., & Afrizal, S. (2025). Persepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sosiologi Pada Dominasi Perempuan Dalam Pembuatan Tren “ Marriage is Scary .” 07(01), 70–80.
Permana, M. Z. (2021). Gambaran kesepian pada emerging adulthood. 16(2), 133–142.
Razif, M. (2023). No Title. 8(2), 212–224.
s.budi, p.hari, H. (n.d.). Urgensi kriminalisasi kumpul kebo (. 6(2), 166–182.
Setyawan, W. B., & Abadi, T. W. (2025). Dinamika Etnografi Komunikasi Simulasi Rumah Tangga di Kalangan Mahasiswa Yogyakarta. 2, 1–15.
Simbolik, I., & Mead, G. H. (2024). Pendidikan sebagai Arena Simbolik : Telaah Konseptual. 3, 27–41.
Study, T. H. E., The, O. F., The, C., Of, B., & Students, C. (n.d.). STUDI KASUS PERILAKU PELAKU KUMPUL KEBO MAHASISWA. 1–10.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aprilian Dani Bagus Setiawan, Putri Gevira, Rauly Sijabat (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
