Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam Tindak Pidana Penipuan Berbasis Deepfake
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63822/kk4f2f38Keywords:
Deepfake; Generative Artificial Intelligence; Criminal Liability; Cyber FraudAbstract
The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence has introduced deepfake technology capable of producing highly realistic images, voices, and videos, creating new opportunities for fraud. This study examines the characteristics of deepfake-based fraud, analyzes criminal liability for offenders using AI, and identifies challenges in law enforcement in Indonesia. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches based on the Indonesian Criminal Code, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, and relevant legal literature. The findings show that deepfake fraud represents a new form of conventional fraud through synthetic digital identity, creating cross-border crimes and evidentiary difficulties. Criminal liability remains attributable to human offenders who use AI as an instrument of crime. However, law enforcement faces challenges related to digital forensics, jurisdiction, and institutional capacity. Strengthening legal regulation, investigative capabilities, and adaptive criminal law policies is essential to address AI-based crimes effectively.
References
Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review, 107(6), 1753–1820. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38RS6M386
Cyberspace Administration of China. (2023). Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis Internet Information Services.
Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27, 2672–2680. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.2661
Hallevy, G. (2021). Liability for crimes involving artificial intelligence systems (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80234-9
Handayani, R. (2022). Tanggung jawab pidana terhadap penyalahgunaan teknologi voice cloning dalam praktik penipuan perbankan. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi, 9(2), 145–163.
Indonesia. (1915). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Wetboek van Strafrecht). Staatsblad 1915 Nomor 732.
Indonesia. (1981). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1981 Nomor 76.
Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024.
Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana oleh Korporasi.
Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 218.
Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 1.
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. (2023). Surat Edaran Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Nomor 9 Tahun 2023 tentang Etika Kecerdasan Artifisial.
Marwan, A., & Kusuma, D. (2020). Urgensi pengaturan deepfake dalam hukum pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(3), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.3.2020.401-420
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum (Edisi Revisi). Prenadamedia Group.
Moeljatno. (2018). Asas-asas hukum pidana (Edisi Revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Nasution, M. R. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam penyalahgunaan kecerdasan artifisial untuk kejahatan siber. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 53(2), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol53.no2.4042
Pratama, Y., & Wulandari, S. (2024). Pembuktian digital forensik terhadap konten deepfake dalam proses peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 27(1), 77–95.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Rajawali Pers.
State of California. (2019). Assembly Bill No. 730 (2019), California Elections Code Section 20010.
Stupp, C. (2019, August 30). Fraudsters used AI to mimic CEO's voice in unusual cybercrime case. The Wall Street Journal.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ilham Fatkul Fadjri, Aturkian Laia (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
