Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Pelaku Pencabulan Anak Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan

Authors

  • Ega Surya Perdana Universitas Narotama Author
  • Miftakhul Huda Universitas Narotama Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63822/hzqffj64

Keywords:

Legal Protection for Children, Child Molesters, Principle of Justice, Juvenile Criminal Justice System

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of legal protection for children in conflict with the law (ABH) as perpetrators of child molestation, particularly in terms of its compliance with the principles of justice in Indonesia. This study uses a normative-empirical method, focusing on an analysis of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA) and court ruling practices. The results indicate that the Indonesian legal framework strives to balance restorative justice (protection and rehabilitation of child offenders) with demands for retributive justice (criminal accountability). The SPPA Law prioritizes the best interests of children through diversion and non-imprisonment sanctions. However, in cases of child molestation, this goal is legally hampered by the threat of criminal penalties exceeding the 7-year prison sentence required for diversion (Article 7 of the SPPA Law). This situation creates a justice dilemma. Justice for victims (which demands severe accountability) often conflicts with the protection of the rights of child offenders. Although diversion is formally difficult to implement, law enforcement officials often use discretion and the results of community research (Litmas) to apply restorative justice principles during trials. However, this practice is often not balanced with adequate fulfillment of victims' rights, such as restitution and rehabilitation, resulting in substantive justice not being achieved holistically. The conclusion of this study confirms that legal protection for child molesters does not fully align with the principle of balanced justice due to normative barriers and the weak integration of victim recovery into the restorative process. It is recommended that the limits of the criminal penalty for diversion in the Child Protection and Protection Act (UU SPPA) be revised and the mandatory restitution mechanism strengthened for victims to achieve complete justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beniharmoni Harefa. (2013). Kapita Selekta Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak. Bandung: PT. Alumni

Damos Dumoli Agusman. (2013). Suatu Pengantar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama

Darwan Prinst. (2013). Hukum Anak Indonesia, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti)

Johnny Ibrahim. (2008). Teori, Metode dan Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publising

Maidin Gultom. (2006). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak. Bandung: Refika Aditama

Muladi. (2013). Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana dan Implementasinya dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana yang dilakukan oleh Anak-Anak. Jakarta: BPHN

Nashriana. (2014). Perlindungan Hukum Pidana Bagi Anak di Indonesia. Jakarta: Fajar Interpratama

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group

Waluyadi. (2009). Hukum Perlindungan Anak. Bandung: Mandar Maju

Analiansyah dan Syarifah Rahmatillah. (2015). Perlindungan Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum (Studi Terhadap Undang-Undang Peradilan Anak Indonesia Dan Peradilan Adat Aceh), Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura. Vol. 1 No. 1

Eko Syahputra. (2021). Restorative Justice dalam Sistem peradilan Pidana di Masa yang Akan Datang. Lex Lata Vol. 3, No. 2

Marlina. (2008). Penerapan Konsep Diversi Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Equality Vol. 13, No. 1

Sherly Adam dkk. (2021). Penjatuhan Sanksi Bagi Anak Didik Pemasyarakatan Pasca Melarikan Diri (Studi pada Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Kelas II Ambon). Tatohi Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol (1). No. 1

Yulia, R. (2012). Keadilan Restoratif dan Korban Pelanggaran HAM (Sebuah Telaah Awal). Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 1 (2), 275-292

Zainuddin, M., Karina, A. D. (2023). Penggunaan Metode Yuridis Normatif Dalam Membuktikan

Kebenaran Pada Penelitian Hukum. Smart Law Journal. Vol 2 (2), 114-123

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana

Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Anak

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 65 Tahun 2015 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi dan Penanganan Anak

Published

2026-01-04

How to Cite

Perdana, E. S., & Huda, M. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Pelaku Pencabulan Anak Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(1), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.63822/hzqffj64