Uji Validitas Isi dan Konstruk pada Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Pembelajaran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63822/kdaefy18Keywords:
Instrument Development, Learning Evaluation, Content Validity, Construct Validity, ReliabilityAbstract
This study aims to describe the process of developing a learning evaluation instrument and to examine its quality in terms of content validity, construct validity, and reliability. The research employed the Research and Development (R&D) method, which consisted of several stages, namely needs analysis, blueprint development, item construction, expert validation, instrument revision, and field testing. Data were collected through validation sheets, questionnaires, and documentation. Content validity was analyzed using Aiken’s V index, construct validity was examined using Pearson’s Product Moment correlation, and instrument reliability was measured using Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient. The results revealed that the developed instrument demonstrated good quality. The content validity test indicated that most instrument items were categorized as valid to highly valid, with Aiken’s V values ranging from 0.61 to 1.00. The construct validity test showed that 9 out of 10 items were declared valid because their calculated correlation coefficients exceeded the critical value of the correlation table, while one item required revision. Furthermore, the reliability test yielded a Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of 0.87, indicating that the instrument was reliable. These findings suggest that the developed learning evaluation instrument meets the criteria of a high-quality instrument, being both valid and reliable, and is therefore suitable for use as an evaluation tool in the learning process. The systematic development of the instrument contributes to more objective, accurate, and trustworthy measurement outcomes.
References
(2022), M. F. (n.d.). Pentingnya evaluasi dalam proses pembelajaran.
Dan, K., Beda, D., & Soal, B. (2023). 1 2 3 4. 09, 2986–2995.
Forester, B. J., Idris, A., Khater, A., Afgani, M. W., Isnaini, M., Islam, U., Raden, N., & Palembang, F. (2024). Penelitian Kuantitatif : Uji Reliabilitas Quantitative Research : Data Reliability Test. 4(3), 1812–1820.
GA Rukminingsih, M. L. (2020). (n.d.). Metode penelitian pendidikan.
Ilmiah, J., & Tingang, K. (2021). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright Ⓒ FKIP Universitas Palangka Raya. 12(1), 1–9.
Januwariska, H. D., Sitorus, R. H., Wahyudi, D. A., Battuta, U., Belajar, P. H., & Soal, V. (n.d.). Pengaruh validitas soal terhadap keakuratan hasil penilaian. 75–82.
Latifah, U., & Damayanti, M. I. (2022). Pengembangan Alat Evaluasi Pembelajaran Menggunakan Platform Wordwall.Net. Jurnal Pgsd Univeritas Negeri Surabaya, 10(6), 1415–1424.
Mahkotawati, R., Rijanto, T., & Rusimamto, P. W. (2025). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian : Angket Pengalaman Praktik Kerja Lapangan ( PKL ) pada Siswa SMK. 8, 1830–1835.
Maulana, A. (2022). Analisis Validtas , Reliabilitas , dan Kelayakan Instrumen Penilaian Rasa Percaya Diri Siswa. 3(3), 133–139.
Millah, A. S., Arobiah, D., Febriani, E. S., & Ramdhani, E. (2023). Analisis Data dalam Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. 1(2), 140–153.
Pembelajaran, E. (2022). KOMPETENSI GURU DALAM MENYUSUN PERENCANAAN EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN Oleh : Ahmad Faisal . 1(2), 1–8.
Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. (n.d.).
Pohan, N. A., Mawaddah, T., Batubara, I. H., & Rahmah, M. F. (2023). Pengembangan Alat Evaluasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7, 30701–30705.
Rahmawati, L., & Azizah, N. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi pembelajaran berbasis kompetensi. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 10(2), 123–132. https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/ishel/article/view/57763
Restu damayanti. (n.d.). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 3 (Restu Damayanti.
Restu, N., Nabil, A., Wulandari, I., Yamtinah, S., Retno, S., Ariani, D., & Ulfa, M. (2022). ISI INSTRUMEN ASESMEN KOMPETENSI MINIMUM. 25(2), 184–191.
Risambessy, J. (2023). Analisis Butir Soal Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Kristen dan Budi Pekerti. 2(01), 50–58.
S Arikunto (2021). (n.d.). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan edisi 3.
Saputra, A., & Mayurida. (2025). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi (Analisis Pengembangan Penilaian Satuan Pendidikan MTs/SMP). Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan, 2(4), 313–323.
Septiani, A. D., Sjaifuddin, S., & ... (2022). … Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas VII Pada Tema Hujan Asam (Development of Two-Tier Multiple Choice Test Evaluation Instruments Based on Science Literacy for Class …. BIODIK: Jurnal Ilmiah …, 08, 167–174. https://eprints.untirta.ac.id/11386/%0Ahttps://eprints.untirta.ac.id/11386/1/25.din_biodik_two-tier.pdf
Shalihah, I., Ridlo, U., Syarif, U., & Jakarta, H. (2025). Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas. 1(1), 69–81.
SR Rindrayani, R Rustiyana, L Judijanto, G. A. (2025). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan: R&D Research and Development.
Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (n.d.). Evaluasi Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif : Sebuah Studi Pustaka. 5(4), 5599–5609.
Utami, L., Ilahi, D. P., Ratih, A., Yenti, E., Aiken, I., & Isi, V. (2024). ANALISIS INDEKS AIKEN UNTUK MENGETAHUI VALIDITAS ISI. 6(1), 59–67.
Validitas, M., Pembelajaran, D., Apa, P., Lakukan, A., & Hal, T. (2025). Torang Siregar A. PENDAHULUAN Profesional L&D terus-menerus dihadapkan pada pilihan: 7(1), 1–12.
Zayrin, A. A., Nupus, H., Maizia, K. K., & Marsela, S. (2025). Analisis Instrumen Penelitian Pendidikan ( Uji Validitas Dan Relibilitas Instrumen Penelitian ). 780–789.
Zulfia, N., Muzaki, A., & Syam, W. (2026). Evaluasi proses pembelajaran dan evaluasi pendidikan : perspektif kontemporer dalam peningkatan kualitas pendidikan. 16(April 2024), 1–18.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Noviarni Taneo, Sarci Henukh (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
