Tinjauan Etika Profesi dan Independensi Auditor dalam Mempertahankan Kualitas Audit di Era Digital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63822/5qn0yb69Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Big Data Analytics, professional ethics of auditors, auditor independence, audit quality, Islamic auditing.Abstract
The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Big Data Analytics (BDA) has transformed modern auditing practices by improving efficiency, accuracy, and data analysis capabilities. However, the digitalization of auditing also presents challenges to professional ethics and auditor independence, particularly regarding automation bias, data confidentiality, and the decline of professional skepticism. This study aims to analyze the influence of AI and BDA implementation on professional ethics, auditor independence, and audit quality in the digital era from the perspective of Islamic accounting. This research employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive-qualitative design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and documentation involving 12 informants consisting of public accounting firm auditors, academics in auditing and Islamic accounting, and audit technology practitioners in Indonesia selected using purposive sampling techniques. Data analysis was conducted systematically through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that AI and BDA are capable of improving audit quality through increased audit efficiency, more accurate analytical processes, and faster risk detection capabilities. Nevertheless, the use of technology also creates risks of excessive dependence on automated systems and data security threats if not supported by adequate technological competence and the strengthening of auditors’ professional ethics. The novelty of this study lies in the integration of digital auditing, auditor independence, and Islamic accounting values within a comprehensive framework. This study implies the importance of strengthening digital literacy, data security, and digital audit ethical standards, although the findings remain limited to a specific context and number of informants.
References
Al-Ateeq, B., Sawan, N., Al-Hajaya, K., Altarawneh, M., & Al-Makhadmeh, A. (2022). Big data analytics in auditing and the consequences for audit quality: A study using the technology acceptance model (TAM). Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 6(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i1p5
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
IAASB. (2024). IAASB unveils new technology position to shape the future of audit and assurance standards.
Janvrin, D. J., & Watson, M. W. (2017). Big Data: A new twist to accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 38, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.12.009
Laine, J., Minkkinen, M., & Mäntymäki, M. (2024). Ethics-based AI auditing: A systematic literature review on conceptualizations of ethical principles and knowledge contributions to stakeholders. Information & Management, 61(5), 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2024.103969
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Munoko, I., Brown-Liburd, H. L., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2020). The ethical implications of using artificial intelligence in auditing. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04407-1
Murikah, W., Nthenge, J. K., & Musyoka, F. M. (2024). Bias and ethics of AI systems applied in auditing: A systematic review. Scientific African, 25, e02281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02281
Schiff, D. S., Kelley, S., & Camacho Ibáñez, J. (2024). The emergence of artificial intelligence ethics auditing. Big Data & Society, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241299732
Velayutham, S. (2014). Conventional vs. Islamic corporate governance: A framework for an Islamic corporate governance model. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 5(2), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2012-0058
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nastiti Handayani, Nazila Aolivia Hindana, Uswatun Khasanah, Fikri Rizki Utama (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




