Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Behavioral Intention to Use Generative AI untuk Pembuatan Konten Media Sosial pada Mahasiswa di Jakarta

Authors

  • Damar Lintang Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author
  • Diena Noviarini Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author
  • Meta Bara Berutu Universitas Negeri Jakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63822/k8r7re18

Keywords:

Generative AI; Behavioral Intention; UTAUT; Information Quality; Social Media Content; Google Gemini

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors influencing the behavioral intention to use Generative AI, specifically Google Gemini, for social media content creation among university students in Jakarta. This research integrates the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) with the information quality construct. The study employed a quantitative approach with data collected from 320 students through online questionnaires. Data analysis was performed using PLS-SEM. The findings reveal that effort expectancy, information quality, and attitude have positive and significant effects on behavioral intention, while performance expectancy does not significantly influence behavioral intention. Attitude emerges as the most dominant predictor. These results contribute theoretically to technology acceptance literature and provide practical insights for technology developers and educational institutions in optimizing Generative AI adoption among young creators in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd Aziz, A., Nor, R. N. H., Jusoh, Y. Y., Rahman, W. N. W. A., & Ali, N. M. (2024). Factors influencing information quality of information systems: A systematic literature review. JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 8(3-2), 1923-1931.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Alexandra, S., Handayani, P. W., & Azzahro, F. (2021). Indonesian hospital telemedicine acceptance model: The influence of user behavior and technological dimensions. Heliyon, 7(12).

Alkhowaiter, W. A. (2022). Use and behavioural intention of m-payment in GCC countries: Extending meta-UTAUT with trust and Islamic religiosity. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100240.

Allah Pitchay, A., Ganesan, Y., Zulkifli, N. S., & Khaliq, A. (2022). Determinants of customers' intention to use online food delivery application through smartphone in Malaysia. British Food Journal, 124(3), 732-753.

Allied Market Research. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in social media market size, share, competitive landscape and trend analysis report, 2021-2031. Allied Market Research.

Al-Maroof, R. S., Alnazzawi, N., Akour, I. A., Ayoubi, K., Alhumaid, K., AlAhbabi, N. M., & Aburayya, A. (2021). The effectiveness of online platforms after the pandemic: Will face-to-face classes affect students' perception of their behavioural intention (BIU) to use online platforms? Informatics, 8(4), 83.

AlQaifi, F., & Tengilimoglu, D. (2025). Factors affecting dentists' intention to adopt artificial intelligence: An extension of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 1-18.

Al-Rahmi, A. M., Shamsuddin, A., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., Yusof, F. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2021). The influence of information system success and technology acceptance model on social media factors in education. Sustainability, 13(14), 7770.

Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (2025). Survei penetrasi internet Indonesia 2025. APJII.

Balakrishnan, J., Abed, S. S., & Jones, P. (2022). The role of meta-UTAUT factors, perceived anthropomorphism, perceived intelligence, and social self-efficacy in chatbot-based services. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121692.

Basuki, R., Tarigan, Z. J. H., Siagian, H., Limanta, L. S., & Setiawan, D. (2022). The effects of perceived ease of use, usefulness, enjoyment and intention to use online platforms on behavioral intention in online movie watching during the pandemic era. Doctoral dissertation, Petra Christian University.

Bervell, B., Nyagorme, P., & Arkorful, V. (2020). LMS-enabled blended learning use intentions among distance education tutors: Examining the mediation role of attitude based on technology-related stimulus-response theoretical framework.

Bougueffa, H., Keita, M., Hamidouche, W., Ahmed, A. T., López, H. L., Martin, A., & Hadid, A. (2024). Advances in AI-generated images and videos. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 9(1), 173-208.

Bucknell Bossen, C., & Kottasz, R. (2020). Uses and gratifications sought by pre-adolescent and adolescent TikTok consumers. Young Consumers, 21(4), 463-478.

Candra, S., Frederica, E., Putri, H. A., & Loang, O. K. (2025). The UTAUT approach to Indonesia's behavioral intention to use mobile health apps. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 16(5), 892-911.

Chanda, R. C., Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Hanifah, H., & Ramayah, T. (2024). Investigating factors influencing individual user's intention to adopt cloud computing: A hybrid approach using PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Kybernetes, 53(11), 4470-4501.

Chen, J., Wang, T., Fang, Z., & Wang, H. (2023). Research on elderly users' intentions to accept wearable devices based on the improved UTAUT model. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1035398.

Chin, C. H., Wong, W. P. M., & Ngian, E. T. (2024). The behavioral intention of young travelers to use virtual reality technology in cultural tourism destinations: An application of technology acceptance model. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 18(3), 552-570.

Chiu, W., Lee, L. Y. S., & Cho, H. (2025). Online food delivery services and behavioral intention: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling from the UTAUT perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 1-19.

Chung, J. G., Hong, S., Choi, J., & Oh, C. (2025). Understanding the dynamics in deploying AI-based content creation support tools in broadcasting systems: Benefits, challenges, and directions. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-28).

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.

Faruq, M. A. A., Bassalamah, M. R., Sudaryanti, D., & Azizah, N. N. (2023). Hedonic values and utilitarian values to improve behavioral intentions and consumer satisfaction on product. Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), 5(3), 319-333.

Fitrianie, S., Horsch, C., Beun, R. J., Griffioen-Both, F., & Brinkman, W. P. (2021). Factors affecting user's behavioral intention and use of a mobile-phone-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: A small-scale UTAUT analysis. Journal of Medical Systems, 45(12), 110.

Giandi, O., Irawan, I., & Ambarwati, R. (2020). Determinants of behavior intention and use behavior among Bukalapak's consumers. IPTEK The Journal for Technology and Science, 31(2), 158-168.

Grand View Research. (2024). Generative AI market (2025-2030). Grand View Research.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hootsuite. (2024). Hootsuite social trends 2024 report. Hootsuite.

Hunde, M. K., Demsash, A. W., & Walle, A. D. (2023). Behavioral intention to use e-learning and its associated factors among health science students in Mettu University, southwest Ethiopia: Using modified UTAUT model. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 36, 101154.

Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2024). Google Gemini as a next generation AI educational tool: A review of emerging educational technology. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 22.

Iqbal, Q., Ahmad, N. H., & Nawaz, R. (2020). Perceived information pollution: Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity. Online Information Review, 44(3), 705-722.

Jiang, X., Yuan, L., O. Alshaghdali, N., Galgotia, A., Monaco, A., & Dell'Aversano, S. (2025). The nexus between learning engagement, knowledge acquisition and valence of use: Role of generative AI adoption in business context. Journal of Knowledge Management.

Kim, J. Y., Li, Y., & Choi, J. (2023). Understanding the continuance intention to use chatbot services. Asia Marketing Journal.

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

Koteczki, R., & Balassa, B. E. (2025). Exploring Generation Z's acceptance of artificial intelligence in higher education: A TAM and UTAUT-based PLS-SEM and cluster analysis. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1044.

Kumar, J. A., Bervell, B., Annamalai, N., & Osman, S. (2020). Behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the role of self-efficacy, subjective norm, and WhatsApp use habit. IEEE Access, 8, 208058-208074.

Kusmaryono, I., Wijayanti, D., & Maharani, H. R. (2022). Number of response options, reliability, validity, and potential bias in the use of Likert scale in educational research. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(1), 1-12.

Lee, H., Park, J. Y., Kim, S., & Hwang, J. (2025). Am I ready to use self-driving robot food delivery? A comparison between countries that use the extended UTAUT model. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.

Lee, U. K., & Kim, H. (2022). UTAUT in metaverse: An "Ifland" case. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 17(2), 613-635.

Li, W. (2025). A study on factors influencing designers' behavioral intention in using AI-generated content for assisted design: Perceived anxiety, perceived risk, and UTAUT. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(2), 1064-1077.

Mailizar, M., Burg, D., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining university students' behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7057-7077.

Mata, M., Ancheta, R., Batucan, G., & Gonzales, G. G. (2024). Exploring technology acceptance model with system characteristics to investigate sustainable building information modeling adoption in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry: The case of the Philippines. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 100967.

Mensah, I. K., Zeng, G., & Mwakapesa, D. S. (2022). The behavioral intention to adopt mobile health services: The moderating impact of mobile self-efficacy. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1020474.

Muhardi Saputra, M. S., Berlian Maulidya Izzati, B. M. I., & Jannatul Rahmadiani, J. R. (2021). The acceptance of government resource planning system using UTAUT 2. Jurnal Sistem Informasi (Journal of Information System), 17(1), 1-19.

Musyaffi, A. M., & Muna, A. (2021). Critical factors of cloud accounting acceptance and security for prospective accountants: TAM extension. JRAK, 13(1), 1-6.

Ngo, T. T. A., Phan, T. Y. N., Nguyen, T. K., Le, N. B. T., Nguyen, N. T. A., & Le, T. T. D. (2025). Understanding continuance intention toward the use of AI chatbots in customer service among generation Z in Vietnam. Acta Psychologica, 259, 105468.

Nookhao, S., & Kiattisin, S. (2023). Achieving a successful e-government: Determinants of behavioral intention from Thai citizens' perspective. Heliyon, 9(8).

Polyportis, A., & Pahos, N. (2025). Understanding students' adoption of the ChatGPT chatbot in higher education: The role of anthropomorphism, trust, design novelty and institutional policy. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(2), 315-336.

Popova, Y., & Zagulova, D. (2022). UTAUT model for smart city concept implementation: Use of web applications by residents for everyday operations. Informatics, 9(1), 1-19.

Rahman, M. S., Sabbir, M. M., Zhang, J., Moral, I. H., & Hossain, G. M. S. (2023). Examining students' intention to use ChatGPT: Does trust matter? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 51-71.

Roh, T., Park, B. I., & Xiao, S. S. (2023). Adoption of AI-enabled Robo-advisors in Fintech: Simultaneous employment of UTAUT and the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 24(1), 29-47.

Ruiz-Rojas, L. I., Salvador-Ullauri, L., & Acosta-Vargas, P. (2024). Collaborative working and critical thinking: Adoption of generative artificial intelligence tools in higher education. Sustainability, 16(13), 5367.

Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., Lim, W. M., Yang, X., & Khan, Q. R. (2024). Artificial intelligence and social media on academic performance and mental well-being: Student perceptions of positive impact in the age of smart learning. Heliyon, 10(8).

Shiferaw, K. B., Mengiste, S. A., Gullslett, M. K., Zeleke, A. A., Tilahun, B., Tebeje, T., & Mehari, E. A. (2021). Healthcare providers' acceptance of telemedicine and preference of modalities during COVID-19 pandemics in a low-resource setting: An extended UTAUT model. PLoS ONE, 16(4), e0250220.

Sugandini, D., Istanto, Y., Arundati, R., & Adisti, T. (2022). Intention to adopt e-learning with anxiety: UTAUT model. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 11, 198-212.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Tran, A. Q., Nguyen, L. H., Nguyen, H. S. A., Nguyen, C. T., Vu, L. G., Zhang, M., & Ho, C. S. (2021). Determinants of intention to use artificial intelligence-based diagnosis support system among prospective physicians. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 755644.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.

White, J., Fu, Q., Hays, S., Sandborn, M., Olea, C., Gilbert, H., & Schmidt, D. C. (2023). A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11382.

World Economic Forum. (2025). Future of jobs report 2025. World Economic Forum.

Xu, M., Du, H., Niyato, D., Kang, J., Xiong, Z., Mao, S., & Poor, H. V. (2024). Unleashing the power of edge-cloud generative AI in mobile networks: A survey of AIGC services. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(2), 1127-1170.

Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., & Zhang, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. The Innovation, 2(4).

Yakubu, M. N., David, N., & Abubakar, N. H. (2025). Students' behavioural intention to use content generative AI for learning and research: A UTAUT theoretical perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 1-26.

Yildiz Durak, H., & Onan, A. (2024). Predicting the use of chatbot systems in education: A comparative approach using PLS-SEM and machine learning algorithms. Current Psychology, 43(28), 23656-23674.

Yulian, R. (2024). Factors affecting English Foreign Language (EFL) learners' acceptance of content-based language application for language learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(2), 318-332.

Zhang, B., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, P. (2021). Consumer attitude towards sustainability of fast fashion products in the UK. Sustainability, 13(4), 1646.

Zizka, L. (2025). "It looks good enough": Recognizing the quality of generative AI output in academic writing tasks in higher education. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 1-10.

Published

2026-08-12

How to Cite

Lintang, D., Noviarini, D., & Bara Berutu, M. . (2026). Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Behavioral Intention to Use Generative AI untuk Pembuatan Konten Media Sosial pada Mahasiswa di Jakarta. Ekopedia: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, 2(3), 6911-6927. https://doi.org/10.63822/k8r7re18