Implementasi Prinsip Ekonomi Koperasi dalam Menjaga Keberlanjutan Koperasi Mahasiswa pada Pergantian Kepemimpinan Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi

Authors

  • Al Fathir Raja Rezkan Agrean Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi Author
  • Eka Putri Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi Author
  • Chientya Annisa Rahma Putri Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63822/qdh6g837

Keywords:

implementation, cooperative economic principles, cooperative sustainability, leadership transition, student cooperative

Abstract

This study was motivated by the importance of implementing cooperative economic principles to maintain the sustainability of the Student Cooperative (KOPMA) at Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi during leadership transitions. Periodic changes in management require organizational management that can ensure the continuity of work programs, business activities, and cooperative governance. This study aimed to analyze the implementation of cooperative economic principles in maintaining the sustainability of KOPMA Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi during leadership transitions. The study employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation involving the Chairpersons of KOPMA for Periods I, II, and III, as well as the Secretary of KOPMA for Period II. Data validity was established through source and technique triangulation, as well as tests of credibility, dependability, and confirmability. The findings indicate that cooperative economic principles were implemented through democratic governance, member participation, transparency and accountability, as well as education, training, and management regeneration. Democratic principles were manifested through deliberation, management elections, accountability, and the handover of management accompanied by the transfer of organizational documents and information. Member participation was reflected in involvement in meetings, activities, and cooperative programs, while transparency and accountability were implemented through administrative, financial, inventory, and activity records. Education and management regeneration were carried out through mentoring, guidance, and knowledge transfer across management periods. The sustainability of the cooperative was supported by management commitment, effective communication, cooperation with members and business partners, administrative improvement, and organizational innovation. However, the cooperative continued to face several obstacles, including limited capital, low participation among some members, and limited cooperation with micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). Thus, the sustainability of KOPMA Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi during leadership transitions is supported by the consistent implementation of cooperative principles, organizational system strengthening, management regeneration, and the capacity to adapt and innovate continuously.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfajri, R., & Sya, S. (2022). Pengaruh pendidikan perkoperasian dan kualitas pelayanan koperasi simpan pinjam terhadap partisipasi anggota di KPN Depdikbudcam Padang Selatan. Jurnal Ecogen, 5(4), 637–646. https://doi.org/10.24036/jmpe.v5i4.14033

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dewi, N. K., Hariani, L. S., & Firdaus, R. M. (2020). Partisipasi anggota Kopma: Pelatihan, kualitas dan kreatifitas. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Ekonomi, 5(1).

Hendar, H., & Kusnadi, K. (2005). Ekonomi koperasi. Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Irawan, H., Supriyanto, T., & Ayuniyyah, Q. (2023). Pengaruh partisipasi anggota terhadap keberhasilan usaha koperasi. JIIP – Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(5), 3053–3058. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i5.1749

Lubis, R. I., Nasution, M. Z., & Rambe, R. (2025). Konsep partisipasi anggota dalam koperasi. Ekonom: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 5(3).

Matondang, K. A., Hidayat, N., Hasibuan, A. P., Lubis, E. H., Simanungkalit, J., & Rahmi, S. N. (2026). Partisipasi anggota sebagai kunci keberhasilan koperasi: Studi konseptual berbasis prinsip-prinsip ICA (International Co-operative Alliance). Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis, 3(6), 278–285. https://doi.org/10.62017/jemb.v3i6.8048

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Musfiroh, L. (2016). Analisis pengaruh pendidikan perkoperasian dan motivasi anggota terhadap partisipasi anggota koperasi mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JUPE), 4(3).

Ramadhan, D. D. (2018). Pelaksanaan pendidikan koperasi dan partisipasi anggota Koperasi Mahasiswa (KOPMA) Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JUPE), 6(3).

Republik Indonesia. (1992). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 1992 tentang Perkoperasian. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.

Safitriana, H., & Subiyantoro, H. (2024). Studi tentang partisipasi pada Koperasi Mahasiswa Amanah Universitas Bhinneka PGRI (Pembina, Pengawas, Pengurus dan Anggota). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pendidikan, 20(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.21831/jep.v20i1.64245

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Sukmayadi, S., Kurniasih, N., & Sutopo, S. (2026). Peningkatan pemahaman prinsip koperasi melalui pendidikan dan pelatihan bagi pengurus dan anggota KDMP di Kabupaten Sumedang. Joong-Ki: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 5(4), 1496–1504.

Syaiful, M., Bantun, S., Sari, J. Y., Daiona, A. I. B., & Novriadi, T. (2022). Pendidikan dasar koperasi (DIKSARKOP) sebagai upaya meningkatkan pengetahuan perkoperasian anggota koperasi mahasiswa. Reswara: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 3(2). https://jurnal.dharmawangsa.ac.id/index.php/reswara/article/view/1973

Published

2026-09-29

How to Cite

Agrean, A. F. R. R., Putri, E. ., & Putri, C. A. R. . (2026). Implementasi Prinsip Ekonomi Koperasi dalam Menjaga Keberlanjutan Koperasi Mahasiswa pada Pergantian Kepemimpinan Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi. Ekopedia: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, 2(3), 4068-4080. https://doi.org/10.63822/qdh6g837