Restorative Justice dalam KUHP Baru: Antara Kepastian Hukum dan Diskresi Aparat Penegak Hukum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63822/4s9w4q19Keywords:
Restorative justice; New Criminal Procedure Code; Criminal justice system.Abstract
Restorative justice has emerged as an alternative approach to resolving criminal cases, emphasizing the restoration of relationships among the offender, the victim, and the community. The reform of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) presents a strategic opportunity to integrate restorative justice as a new paradigm for criminal case resolution, particularly during the police investigation stage. This study aims to analyze the urgency of embedding restorative justice within the new Criminal Procedure Code to establish a legal basis for police authority and to assess its implications for Indonesia's criminal justice system. The research employs a normative-juridical method, utilizing both statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that incorporating restorative justice into the new Criminal Procedure Code is essential to provide clear legal legitimacy for restorative case resolution practices, prevent policy fragmentation among law enforcement agencies, and foster the realization of substantive, restoration-oriented justice.
References
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.
Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan keadilan restoratif.
Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang penanganan tindak pidana berdasarkan keadilan restoratif.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2020). Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020 tentang pedoman penerapan restorative justice.
Marshall, T. F. (1999). Restorative justice: An overview. Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum. Mataram University Press.
Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (2010). Teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana. Alumni.
Radbruch, G. (1950). Legal philosophy. In C. K. Allen (Ed.), The legal philosophies of Lask, Radbruch and Dabin. Harvard University Press.
Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. (2025). Draft Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (Naskah yang digunakan peneliti).
Sholehuddin, M. (2004). Sistem sanksi dalam hukum pidana: Ide dasar double track system dan implementasinya. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2019). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengesahan International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.
United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations.
Zehr, H. (2005). Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice (3rd ed.). Herald Press.
Zehr, H. (2015). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.
Zulfa, E. A. (2009). Keadilan restoratif. Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Heri Purnomo, Aturkian Laia (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
